Home » Anger: the Good, the Bad and Managing It

Anger: the Good, the Bad and Managing It

This past Sunday during the Oscars, Chris Rock made a joke about Will Smith’s wife. Will Smith walked up on the stage and slapped him for it. When first seeing the video, I was shocked and thought it was staged, it was so unbelievable. But it wasn’t. Will Smith was angry. The reactions varied from […]

This past Sunday during the Oscars, Chris Rock made a joke about Will Smith’s wife. Will Smith walked up on the stage and slapped him for it. When first seeing the video, I was shocked and thought it was staged, it was so unbelievable. But it wasn’t. Will Smith was angry. The reactions varied from those saying he was defending his wife to his actions being an indication of toxic masculinity.

Outside of seeing the clip, I didn’t know the context. Did the two have a history? How many times has Will Smith heard slights or jokes about his wife’s medical condition? This by no means condones the behaviour, and there are obviously much better ways one could have handled it. But the event made me look at my own relationship with anger and my work on managing it.

managing anger

What is anger?

The American Psychological Association defines anger as “…an emotion characterized by antagonism toward someone or something you feel has deliberately done you wrong.” We often think of anger as bad, but like all emotions, it has a place. Anger can alert you to when you, or someone you love, is being hurt or mistreated. It can also motivate you to solve a problem.

However, chronic anger, and misplaced anger, can result in poor physical and mental well-being, as well as damage relationships. A US survey of more than 34,000 adults found 7.8% of adults experienced damaging anger. And during the pandemic, 39% reported feeling angry in the past two weeks. While anger can be experienced by both men and women, it’s far more prominent in men and younger adults.

Anger is a powerful emotion. It’s one of strength and action. Being angry can help in getting things done. But anger can also be a secondary emotion. When one is hurt or disappointed, anger may be a far more comfortable emotion to express. It can be protective, rather than facing more vulnerable emotions such as sadness and grief.

My Story

My relationship with anger likely began in my childhood. And this is often the case for many people. Throughout middle school I was bullied. I experienced verbal and physical abuse at the hands of my peers. Sometimes it involved schoolyard fights, but more often it involved a few kids pinning me down and writing with marker on my forehead. I wasn’t the only one subjected to this and a friend of mine said he was glad I was around so he wouldn’t be targeted as much.

I never fought back. I never told a teacher or anyone. I was ashamed. I felt weak. Back in the 1980s, there was a more prominent tough it out attitude. And even if you found a teacher willing to jump in, you knew telling on the other kids would come back to haunt you. So instead, I stayed quiet and hoped they would get tired of bugging me. Even now with all the progress, bullying still happens and kids can still be ostracized by seeking help.

By early high school, the bullying stopped. Over the next few years I became more resilient and independent-minded. I found confidence in sports. But I also became more aggressive. I spent time in the school gym lifting weights and using the punching bag. I loaded expectation onto myself to do better and prove myself. And I became more easily irritated.

In my early 20s I found an outlet in men’s hockey. A ‘safe’ place where it’s acceptable to get angry. As I wasn’t very skilled, my contribution to the team was goading one of the other team’s better players into a fight. The fights didn’t last very long as I would usually fell on the ice. Many other players also seemed to take out their week’s frustration in the weekend hockey game. After a couple of years I stopped playing as I was disgusted by the person I was becoming.

making amends for anger

Making Amends

While recognizing where one’s anger stems from is important, it in no way justifies the hurt and harmful behaviours caused to others. The first step to addressing destructive anger behaviours is recognizing it occurs. That’s easier said than done. Especially if it’s an emotion that’s been with you all your life. Or one that’s crept up on you over time. Usually it requires someone else telling you it’s a problem.

Making amends to those affected is important. Apologizing to people who may have been hurt is necessary. After receiving his Oscar for best actor, Will Smith apologized to the audience for attacking Chris Rock. But he never mentioned Chris’ name. The day after, a written apology was posted on Instagram in which he did apologize directly to Chris Rock.

Apologizing is hard. It means admitting you did something wrong. It stirs up emotions of guilt and shame. It also makes you vulnerable to those you apologize to as they may (rightly) tell you how it made them feel. An apology also needs to be done without any expectation it is going to be welcomed. When you’re ready to apologize, the receiver may not be ready to forgive, or even hear the apology. It also needs to be personal.

I’ve begun apologizing to those I’ve hurt. In most cases I’ve delivered the apology personally. In others who may not be ready, I’ve written it out letting the person know I would be willing to discuss it with them if/when they are comfortable doing so. Instead of typing the letter, I write them by hand. Seeing it in my own hand makes it more personal for me and hopefully for the receiver. At the same time one can only truly make amends by changing the behaviour. It does no good to apologize and then continue in the same destructive habits going forward.

feelings wheel to help manage anger

Managing Anger

Feeling angry is not wrong. It’s normal. We feel what we feel. And at times it can be helpful. But other times acting on anger can make thing worse, and that’s what we don’t want. Will Smith obviously felt angry, and most of us would agree his anger was justified. But storming the stage and hitting Chris Rock made things worse. Similarly if someone cuts you off and takes the parking spot you were moving into, you would be justified in feeling angry. However, acting on that anger isn’t likely to make things better. And if you still felt angry later in the day such that it prevented you from being happy or affected how you interacted with people, this can be problematic.

There are two key ways to minimize ineffective and harmful anger. One is to not be angry in the first place. Making sure you get a good night’s sleep, regular exercise and healthy eating can all help reduce your chances of getting angry when faced with a stressful situation. If anger is a secondary emotion, try to identify what you’re truly feeling. If you know your triggers, look for ways to avoid them. Or if that’s not possible, how to cope when they do occur. Using a self-directed workbook can help with managing anger.

The other is developing strategies on what to do when you are angry. This may be the hardest step of all as when we’re angry all rational thought goes out the window. But the objective is to not let your anger make things worse. As anger is a very physically charged emotion, doing something such as exercise can be a great way to burn it off. Or you can remove yourself from the triggering situation and distract your mind with something you enjoy. If that’s not possible, focus your mind on your environment using the 5-4-3-2-1 technique to ground yourself.

Additional supports can include joining a support group, talking to your family doctor and/or seeing a therapist. Of course, changing a pattern of behaviour that may have been present for years is not easy. It takes times and the process won’t be perfect at first.

If you like this post, don’t forget to subscribe to my blog at the bottom of the page.

Enjoy listening to podcasts? Check out my show How to Health. A podcast about you and your health.

5 responses to “Anger: the Good, the Bad and Managing It”

  1. Excellent blog Scott, very well explained.

  2. I felt you explained everything really well in this blog post and I enjoyed reading it. Thanks for sharing!

    Feel free to read some of my blogs 🙂

    1. Thanks so much! Will check out your blogs.

  3. In my troubled teen years that took up much of the 1980s, I observed that by ‘swinging first’, in general, a person potentially places himself (or herself) in an unanticipated psychological disadvantage—one favoring the combatant who chooses to patiently wait for his opponent to take the first swing, perhaps even without the fist necessarily connecting.

    Just having the combatant swing at him before he’d even given his challenger a physical justification for doing so seemed to instantly create a combined psychological and physical imperative within to react to that swung fist with justified anger. In fact, such testosterone-prone behavior may be reflected in the typically male (perhaps unconsciously strategic) invitation for one’s foe to ‘go ahead and lay one on me’, while tapping one’s own chin with his forefinger.

    Yet, from my experience, it’s a theoretical advantage not widely recognized by both the regular scrapper mindset nor general society. Instead of the commonly expected advantage of an opponent-stunning first blow, the hit only triggers an infuriated response earning the instigator two-or-more-fold returned-payment hard hits. It brings to mind an analogous scenario in which a chess player recklessly plays white by rashly forcefully moving his pawn first in foolish anticipation that doing so will indeed stupefy his adversary.

    I’ve theorized that it may be an evolutionary instinct ingrained upon the human male psyche—one preventing us from inadvertently killing off our own species by way of an essentially gratuitous instigation of deadly violence in bulk, which also results in a lack of semen providers to maintain our race. Therefore, in this sense, we can survive: If only a first strike typically results in physical violence, avoiding that first strike altogether significantly reduces the risk of this form of wanton self-annihilation. In short, matters should remain peacefully peachy, or at least non-violent, when every party shows the others their proper, due respect. It’s like a proactively perfect solution.

    It should also be noted, however, that on rare occasion (at least from my many years of observation) an anomalous initiator/aggressor will be sufficiently confident, daring and violently motivated, perhaps through internal and/or external anger, to outright breach the abovementioned convention by brazenly throwing the first punch(es).

    Perhaps with the logical anticipation, or hope even, that his conventional foe will physically respond in kind by swinging at or hitting him, the unprovoked initiator/aggressor will feel confident and angered enough to willfully physically continue, finishing what he had essentially inexcusably started. It was as though he had anticipated that through both his boldness in daring to throw the first punch and then furthermore finish the physical job he himself had the gall to unjustifiably start in the first place, he will resultantly intimidate his (though now perhaps already quite intimidated) non-initiator/non-aggressor foe into a crippling inferior sense of physical-defense debilitation, itself capable of resulting in a more serious beating received by that diminished non-initiator/non-aggressor party.

    Or, another possibility remains that the initiator/aggressor will be completely confident that when/if he strikes first and the non-initiator/non-aggressor responds with reactor’s fury, he, the initiator/aggressor will himself respond to that response with even greater fury thus physically/psychologically overwhelm the non-initiator/non-aggressor with a very unfortunate outcome for the latter party. Regardless, it has always both bewildered and sickened me how a person can throw a serious punch without any physical provocation.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: